![]() ![]() The figure quoted by Apple references on page 17 of the filing a search of Google Trends as of Sept. This lawsuit (and the front-page headlines it has generated) appears to be part of a marketing campaign designed to reinvigorate interest in Fortnite.” “By July 2020, interest in Fortnite had decreased by nearly 70% as compared to October 2019. “For reasons having nothing to do with Epic’s claims against Apple, Fortnite’s popularity is on the wane,” Apple’s filing states. Where it gets even more interesting in a battle that has already been colorful to date is the accusation by Apple that Epic was undertaking the lawsuit as a way to gain publicity for Fortnite. The filing states that Epic could have avoided “further harm involving both Fortnite and Unreal Engine” with a press of a button. “Epic started a fire, and poured gasoline on it, and now asks this Court for emergency assistance in putting it out, even though Epic can do so itself in an instant by simply adhering to the contractual terms that have profitably governed its relationship with Apple for years,” the filing states.Īpple once again argues that it is not being anticompetitive and has every right to enforce its own rules, noting that Epic has benefited in the past while complying with them. Apple does not hold back, accusing Epic’s damages of being “entirely self-inflicted.” The 37-page filing Tuesday was filed in opposition to Epic’s application for a preliminary injunction that would force Apple to restore Fortnite to the App Store. has accused Epic Games Ltd.’s lawsuit as being a “campaign to reinvigorate interest in Fortnite” in its latest filing in the battle between the two companies. It also called Apple a “monopolist."Īpple recently responded in an opposing court document, claiming that “Epic started a fire, and poured gasoline on it, and now asks this Court for emergency assistance in putting it out.” Apple also cited Google Trends data, saying that searches for Fortnite are down nearly 70% over last year.Īpple blamed Epic Games for the app store stalemate, saying the gaming company is “holding its own customers hostage to gain leverage in a business dispute.Apple Inc. 4 court filing, Epic Games argued that it is “likely to suffer irreparable harm” if the app isn't allowed back in the App Store. Looking for a job? Facebook says Coursera partnership creates a path government reportedly looking into 'League of Legends' owner Fortnite's direct payment functionality undermined that structure. Typically, when players on iOS devices make in-app purchases, Apple gets a 30% cut of those sales. That payment system would have competed with Apple's in-app purchase system, which the iPhone giant requires all apps to use. In a California court filing, the gaming company refuted a number of claims made by Apple, including one that suggested gamer interest in Fortnite was fleeting.Īpple removed the Fortnite app in August after the gaming company violated Apple's rules by introducing a direct payment option into the game without Apple's approval. On Friday, Epic Games doubled down on its request for a preliminary injunction that would require Apple to put its beloved video game back in the App Store. ![]() ![]() Fortnite creator Epic Games has taken another step in its ongoing battle with Apple. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |